The two cells visible seem to be undergoing cell division (A to

The two cells visible seem to be undergoing cell division. (A to H) Time points at 10 to 17 h, in 1-h increments. Given that graphene is thought to be the hardest material known [3], it is counterintuitive to believe that liver carcinoma cells are capable of folding and compartmentalizing graphene sheets. However, if these sheets contained structural defects such as point defects, single vacancies, multiple vacancies, carbon adatoms, dislocation-like defects, or edge defects, as extensively reviewed by Banhart et al. [26], the cells may be able to fold the sheets, one at a time, along

these TPCA-1 in vitro defect lines (in a ‘shedding nature’) and compartmentalize them within phagosomes or vesicles using reasonably low-energy processes. The defect content KU55933 in vivo of the SGS, in relation to the starting graphite material, can be indicated by the relative intensity of the Raman D band to G band ratio, located at approximately 1,350 and 1,580 cm−1, respectively [27]. Although the synthesis procedure and Raman characterization shown in Additional file 1: Figure S2 shows a weak D band enhancement after exfoliation due to functionalization of the graphitic edges, it remains unclear as to what defects, if any, are inherent

to the graphene nanoplatelets. Conclusions We have investigated the cytotoxicity and internalization of highly exfoliated, water-soluble SGSs when exposed in vitro to highly aggressive human liver cancer cells (SNU449 and Hep3B). Both MTT and WST-1 colorimetric assays displayed a similar concentration- and time-dependent cytotoxicity profile for concentrations of 0.1 to 10 μg/ml. Verubecestat ic50 These trends were also evident from LDH observations. However, the SGSs seemed to be toxic to both cell lines at the highest concentration of 100 μg/ml. We have also observed an interesting cellular internalization

phenomenon for graphene materials for the first time. The cancer cells were capable of internalizing relatively large SGSs with diameters comparable to the cells themselves as well as smaller SGS having heights indicative of single graphene sheets. Although not conclusive, there is evidence to suggest that due to graphene structural defects, the cancer cells are also able to actively fold and compartmentalize these sheets. We speculate that the Bcl-w findings reported here may encourage the development of SGSs for applications in drug delivery, medical imaging, and even hyperthermic cancer therapy by NIR and/or radio frequency heating. To date, such applications have been explored for more rigid carbon nanostructures such as fullerenes [28] and nanotubes [29–32], but a non-toxic, more flexible (foldable), and larger surface-area material as provided by graphene offers an alternative design strategy. Acknowledgments This work was funded by the NIH (U54CA143837), the NIH M.D.

Results Background information of study participants The backgrou

Results Background information of study participants The background information of the study participants is presented in Table 1. The study population comprised 82.2% males. A high proportion (46.7%) of the study participants were within the age category of 21 to 23 years. The majority (63.9%) of the study subjects participated in team events, rather than the other events. Out of the 180 respondents, only 19(10.6%) indicated that they had completed a nutrition-related course in the university. A majority (38.3%) trained for a period of between 1 and 2 hours in a day. The rest trained for longer periods

per day. Table 1 Background Characteristics of Study Participants Variable Groups n (%) Gender Male 148(82.2)   Female 32(17.8) Age Group (years) 18-20 23(12.8)   21-23 84(46.7) AZD4547 nmr   24-26 48(26.7)   27-29 16(8.9)   > 29 9(5.0) University Affiliation UG 32(17.8)   UCC 42(23.3)   UDS 22(12.2)   UEW 26(14.4)   KNUST 25(13.9)   UMaT 10(5.6)   IPS 23(12.8) *Type of Sports Discipline Short buy 4SC-202 distance 30(16.7)

  Middle distance 17(9.4)   Long distance 9(5.0)   Team events 115(63.9)   Both Track and Field events 9(5.0) Completed a Nutrition Course in the University Yes 19(10.6)   No 161(89.4) Training Hours per Day 1- 2 hours/day 69(38.3) 3-Methyladenine molecular weight   3-4 hours/day 47(26.1)   5-6 hours/day 64(35.6) *Type of Sports Discipline: Short Distance – Athletics events ranging from 100 m to 400 m; Middle Distance – Athletics events ranging from 800 m to 1500 m; Long Distance – Athletics events ranging from 3000 m to 10000 m; Team Events – Comprises games like Amino acid soccer, volleyball, basketball, hockey, badminton, tennis, table tennis and handball; Both Track and Field Events – Athletics events ranging from 100 m to 10000 m and field events which comprises athletics events like javelin,

shot putt, discus, high jump, long jump, triple jump and pole vault Responses regarding energy drink consumption patterns The prevalence regarding energy drinks consumption among the surveyed athletes was 62.2%. This is the percentage of athletes who reported consuming an energy drink in the week prior to the study and usually consumed at least one can of energy drink per week, as shown in Table 2. A high proportion (53.6%) of the respondents indicated that they usually drank Lucozade. Other brands of energy drinks consumed included Blue Jeans (16.1%), Red Bull (9.8%), Burn (8.9%), Rox (8.0%) and Gluconade (3.6%). The majority (79.5%) of the respondents reported that they usually drank between 1 and 2 cans of energy drink in a week, whereas 20.5% indicated that they drank between 3 and 4 cans of energy drinks per week. Table 2 Energy Drinks Consumption Practices of Student-athletes Variable n (%) Consumption of energy drinks   Yes 112(62.2) No 68(37.8) Type usually drank   Gluconade 4(3.6) Burn 10(8.9) Blue Jeans 18(16.1) Rox 9(8.0) Red Bull 11(9.8) Lucozade 60(53.