It is also possible that these multisensory integration deficits are causing the synesthetic perception. It could be that subjects with deficits in multisensory integration develop synesthesia to compensate for these deficits. This could explain why one of the most common forms is grapheme-colour synesthesia. When children learn to read and write, Dasatinib clinical trial it is important that the auditory and visual senses

work together properly as acquiring reading/writing skills is mainly a transfer of information from the auditory domain (phonological information) to the visual domain. Thus, synesthesia might be a useful implicit strategy to overcome multisensory integration deficits. To test this idea it would be useful to screen other types of

synesthesia for multisensory integration deficits and to look if the deficits match the involved senses. Our results shed new light on the definition of synesthesia as a ‘mingling of the senses’. Mingled are only the synesthetic parts of their experience but not the ‘normal’ parts of their sensory experience. Normal auditory-visual integration is even weaker. Thus, it would be equally appropriate to speak www.selleckchem.com/products/PLX-4032.html of synesthesia as a ‘separation of the senses’. TFM has been supported by the DFG (a.o. SFB TR31, TP A7). “
“In one common variant of time–space synaesthesia, individuals report the consistent experience of months bound to a spatial arrangement, commonly described as a circle extending outside of the body. Whereas the layout of these calendars has previously been thought to be relatively random and to differ greatly between synaesthetes, Study 1 provides the first evidence suggesting one critical aspect of these calendars is mediated by handedness: clockwise medchemexpress versus counter-clockwise orientation. A study of 34 time–space synaesthetes revealed a strong association between handedness and the

orientation of circular calendars. That is, left-handed time–space synaesthetes tended to report counter-clockwise arrangements and right-handed synaesthetes clockwise. Study 2 tested whether a similar bias was present in non-synaesthetes whose task was to memorize and recall the spatial configuration of a clockwise and counter-clockwise calendar. Non-synaesthetes’ relative performance on these two sorts of calendars was significantly correlated with their handedness scores in a pattern similar to synaesthetes. Specifically, left-handed controls performed better on counter-clockwise calendars compared to clockwise, and right-handed controls on clockwise over counter-clockwise. We suggest that the implicit biases seen in controls are mediated by similar mechanisms as in synaesthesia, highlighting the graded nature of synaesthetic associations.