We therefore used ≥25 m as the final water depth category Flow t

We therefore used ≥25 m as the final water depth category. Flow tides indicated tidal condition before high tides and ebb tides after high tides. The Moreton Bay dugongs made

frequent excursions between two very different habitats: shallow seagrass meadows on the Eastern Banks and deeper offshore waters, east of Moreton and North Stradbroke Islands (Fig. 1; Phinn et al. 2008, Lyons et al. 2012). We expected diving patterns in these habitats to be different, because feeding individuals spend more time submerged to excavate or crop seagrasses than when offshore and not feeding (Marsh et al. 2011). We therefore compared the dugong’s availability for detection in each of these habitat types for the Moreton Bay dugongs only. We used logistic regression via generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). The response learn more variable was binary, and this statistical method can accommodate random components from individual dugongs (Breslow and Clayton 1993). We used Gaussian Hermite Quadrature (GHQ) estimation with lme4 (Bates et al. 2012). The GHQ is based on a restricted maximum likelihood. The GHQ provides estimations that are more accurate than alternative methods, such as Penalized Quasi-likelihood or Laplace approximation (Agresti et al. 2000, Bolker et al. 2009). To compare Carfilzomib models, we used Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Chi-square tests. Diagnostic plots were used to check the performance

of individual models. Dive data comprised a time-series of depth records separated by 1 or 2 s and were strongly autocorrelated. Visual inspection of dive profiles indicated that successive dives tended to be similar. To ensure independent samples, we treated 10 min as a sampling unit (the subsampled period around a GPS or QFP fix). The 10 min interval ensured that at least one complete dive was included in a sample. Longer intervals were not appropriate because the location

of the dugong could change and the estimated water depth needed to remain constant during a sampling unit. A saturated model was first examined using individual dugong as a random factor and water depth, tidal condition, Cepharanthine and habitat types as categorical fixed factors. The model was reduced by removing the tidal variable because some water depth and tide combinations had few observations, and because no tidal effects were identified during exploratory data analysis. We estimated the probabilities of dugongs being in the detection zones using GLMM linear predictor estimates. The 95% confidence intervals for the predicted values were also calculated based on fixed factors. Data manipulations and statistical analyses were executed using SPlus version 8 (TIBCO Software 2007) and R 2.15.1 (R Development Core Team 2011). We estimated and compared the number of dugongs that were not detected during previous aerial surveys of Hervey Bay conducted in 2001, 2005, and 2011 (Lawler 2002, Marsh and Lawler 2006, Sobtzick et al.

Comments are closed.