Unfortunately, the webpage was no longer available. After corresponding with the author, we were informed that their recommendations were no longer graded and we were advised to use the language in the recommendation as a guide. Although they provided strong evidence, without grading the LOEs and SORs it was difficult Docetaxel purchase to interpret the recommendations. The authors have endeavored to use a consistent methodology when grading the

NICE guideline recommendations. While it is not mandatory to use a grading system for the SORs, it provides the reader with valuable information. Finally, the layout of the NICE recommendations was very difficult to follow. The guidelines provided 36 recommendations (18 nonpharmacological recommendations). These were dispersed throughout the document, making it difficult to locate all the recommendations. It would assist the reader if the recommendations were presented in an easily identifiable box summarizing the recommendations or presenting them grouped together at the beginning of the document. Exercise and education were found to be Baf-A1 clinical trial among the strongest interventions recommended throughout the guidelines. While the exercise recommendations ranged from very specific (aerobic, strength training, hydrotherapy)

to very general (exercise of unspecified type), the message was clear that exercise in all its forms is strongly recommended for OA, most specifically for knee OA. The important benefits of exercise include an improvement in pain and function, which are the main complaints reported by OA sufferers. Exercise

is a low-cost option in the management of Urease OA, which makes it accessible to all OA sufferers. Education was also considered a strong recommendation. Education was found to reduce pain, increase coping skills, and result in fewer visits to primary care practitioners in knee OA.5, 20 and 29 In addition, although the supporting evidence concerning tailored exercises was sparse, the consensus from 9 guidelines recommended prescribing individualized patient exercise and education and these are key components of rehabilitation. This critical appraisal has 2 key limitations. First, a new grading scale to grade the overall strength of each recommendation was developed. This was a nonstandardized grading system and requires further testing. Second, guidelines published only in English were reviewed, leading to a potential publication bias. This criterion may misrepresent the amount of research that has been conducted on the physical management of OA globally. The objective of this appraisal was to review the available guidelines and present the treatment recommendations for the physical management of OA in a format that was useful to the user. Throughout the research, there is strong evidence to support aspects of the use of exercise, electrical-based therapy, equipment, education, diet and weight loss, manual therapy, and self-management.