This inhibitory effect was confirmed in S2 cells stably expressing viral Pellino following lentiviral transduction. Viral Pellino also displayed cytoplasmic localisation upon stable expression (Fig. 2C) and inhibited C106-induced activation of the drosomycin promoter (Fig. 2D). This confirms that the entomopoxviral protein can obstruct a key insect immune–response pathway. The high degree of sequence and mechanistic conservation between insect Toll and mammalian TLR signalling pathways led us to further explore the potential immunomodulatory capabilities of viral Pellino in human cells. Expression of increasing amounts of viral Pellino in HEK293-TLR4 cells (Fig. 3A) showed dose-dependent

inhibition of LPS-induction of an NF-κB-responsive promoter–reporter construct (Fig. 3B). We next confirmed that viral Pellino could block the endogenous NF-κB pathway in a cell Bioactive Compound Library purchase that was naturally responsive to LPS by demonstrating that lentivirally delivered viral Pellino

blocked the LPS-induced phosphorylation of the NF-κB subunit p65 upon stable expression in U373 cells (Fig. 3C). The regulatory effects of viral Pellino on the NF-κB pathway Ponatinib in vivo have functional consequences for pro-inflammatory gene expression since the transduction of THP-1 monocytic cells with varying titres of lentivirus, conferring stable viral Pellino expression, caused an inhibition of Morin Hydrate LPS induced expression of the NF-κB-responsive gene IL-8 (Fig. 3D). The highest titre also inhibited LPS induction of TNF

in THP-1 cells (Fig. 3E). These studies confirm the regulatory effects of viral Pellino on TLR4 signalling in a number of cell types. We next investigated the mechanistic basis to the regulatory effects of viral Pellino on TLR signalling. IRAK-1 was an obvious target for viral Pellino, given that the mammalian Pellinos have been shown to associate with IRAK-1 10, 25, probably via their FHA domain, and that the homology modelling studies detailed above suggest the presence of a core FHA domain in viral Pellino. Co-immunprecipitation studies demonstrated that vPellino and IRAK-1 associated upon co-expression. This was observed upon immunoprecipitation of viral Pellino and immunoblotting for IRAK-1 (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, viral Pellino was found to interact with endogenous IRAK-1 upon immunoprecipitation of the latter (Fig. 4B). The IRAK-1-viral Pellino interaction is also apparent under conditions where viral Pellino is expressed at more physiologically relevant levels as facilitated by lentiviral-mediated delivery of viral Pellino into U373 cells (Fig. 4C). Further evidence in support of the IRAK-1-Pellino interaction is provided by co-localisation of IRAK-RFP and viral Pellino-GFP in HEK293 cells (Fig. 4D). Conflicting reports exist on the importance of IRAK-1 kinase activity in the interaction between mammalian Pellinos and IRAK-1 14, 15.