Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to explore the main trends in the data. The canonical axes represent principal components. Sample (M1-M4) locations relative to each other indicate their similarity in the ordination space. Red squares indicate microbial groups in sequence data (a and b) and probes in microarray data (c and d), with the numbers indicating the microarray probes listed
in the Additional file 2. Only the most abundant groups or strongest probe signals were included in the analysis. Blue arrows indicate the physical and chemical parameters used as constraining variables in the analysis (from Tables 1 and 2). The length and position of an arrow illustrates its significance Copanlisib on the canonical axes. Conclusions Our results show that both the mesophilic and thermophilic AD process contain a prominent fungal community that survives and grows in anoxic conditions. This suggests that Fungi may metabolise STI571 nmr organic nutrients for subsequent use by archaeal and bacterial methanogenic groups, thus contributing to the digesting process and biogas production. The microarray proof of principle testing showed the capability of the technique to profile the microbial composition of AD samples. According to our results, the microarray method is capable of
semiquantitative analysis of AD process when comprehensive sequence information is available to support probe design. We expect future metagenomic sequencing of the total genomic content in these environments to enable more accurate probe design and, together with RNA sequencing, Niclosamide to help determining the ecology and metabolic functions of various fungal and other microbial groups present in the AD community. Acknowledgments This work was supported financially by Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation, Finland and the https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Thiazovivin.html Finnish National
Technology Agency (Tekes) ADOPT project (40080/07). PA and MR were funded by the European Regional Development Fund (YMLI project). Electronic supplementary material Additional file 1: Figure of rarefaction curves of Archaea, Bacteria and Fungi in samples M1-M4. (675 KB, PDF) (PDF 674 kb) (PDF 675 KB) Additional file 2: Sequences of ligation probes. Table containing the probe sequences and target Genbank accession numbers. (39 KB, XLS) (XLS 39 kb) (XLS 39 KB) Additional file 3: Sequences of templates used in microarray specificity tests. (40 KB, XLS) (XLS 39 kb) (XLS 40 KB) Additional file 4: Microarray signals of specificity tests. Boxplots of signals of each probe in response to artificial target template pools and alignment scores to sequences in the target pool. (273 KB, PDF) (PDF 273 kb) (PDF 274 KB) Additional file 5: Microarray signals of sensitivity tests. Figures showing microarray signals of different concentrations of synthetic template oligos. (47 KB, PDF) (PDF 47 kb) (PDF 48 KB) Additional file 6: Example of microarray signals of mismatching probes.