For such bacteria, the antibiotics may be considered active with

For such bacteria, the antibiotics may be considered active with regards to β-lactamase based resistance. Table 4 Ratios from β-LEAF assays to assess activity of tested antibiotics in context of β-lactamase resistance   S. aureus isolate Antibiotic #1 #2* #6 #18 #19 #20

Cefazolin 0.11 0.55 0.08 0.13 0.12 0.36 Cefoxitin 0.11 0.64 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.30 Cefepime 0.68 0.44 0.80 0.58 0.47 0.66 Ratios were calculated as [Cleavage rate (β-LEAF + antibiotic)/Cleavage rate (β-LEAF alone)] using data depicted in Figure 3, for each antibiotic for the different bacteria tested, and rounded to two decimal points. Closer the value to ‘1’, more active an antibiotic predicted to be

for the respective bacterial strain/isolate taking β-lactamase resistance into consideration. NOTE: *For isolates that show low cleavage rates with P505-15 molecular weight β-LEAF (e.g. #2), there is negligible difference in values when antibiotics are included in the reaction, and the ratios may give exaggerated results. For such strains, the antibiotics may be considered active/usable. Comparison of E-test and β-LEAF assay results Next, the antibiotic activity data for cefoxitin and cefepime from the fluorescence based β-LEAF assay was compared to antibiotic susceptibility determined using E-tests. We utilized the E-test an alternate AST method to determine antibiotic Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) susceptibility conventionally. For S. aureus, cefoxitin is used as an oxacillin surrogate, and oxacillin resistance and cefoxitin check details resistance are equated [41]. Applying these criteria, #1, #2 and #6 were predicted as cefoxitin susceptible, while #18, #19 and #20 were predicted to have different degrees of resistance to cefoxitin (Table 5). However, #1, #6, #18, #19 and #20 were shown to be β-lactamase producers (Table 2, columns 2, 3 and 4), with the β-LEAF assay indicating cefoxitin to be less active (Figure 3, Table 4). All isolates were predicted to be susceptible

to cefepime (Table 5), consistent with β-LEAF assay predictions, and with cefepime being stable to β-lactamases. Table 5 Cefoxitin and Cefepime MIC (by E-test) for selected bacterial isolates S. aureus isolate Cefoxitin MIC (μg/ml) Cefoxitin AS* Cefepime MIC (μg/ml) Cefepime AS** #1 3.0 ± 0.0 S 3.3 ± 0.3 S #2 2.2 ± 0.4 S 1.7 ± 0.3 S #6 3.0 ± 1.0 S 2.8 ± 0.7 S #18 4.0 ± 1.0 I 2.0 ± 0.5 S #19 6.0 ± 1.0 I 3.0 ± 0.6 S #20 20.0 ± 2.3 R 7.0 ± 0.6 S *The Cefoxitin Antibiotic Susceptibility (AS) was determined using the CLSI Interpretive Criteria for cefoxitin as an oxacillin surrogate [41]. ≤ 4 μg/ml – PCI-32765 datasheet susceptible (S), ≥ 8 μg/ml- Resistant (R), values in between Intermediate (I). **The Cefepime Antibiotic Susceptibility (AS) was determined using the CLSI Interpretive Criteria for cefepime [41].

Comments are closed.