Disparities in longer-term survival have not narrowed with time; the survival remains
worse in black recipients.”
“A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the laboratory scale determination of the tocopherol content of assai pulp is reported. This method includes the description of microscale saponification and extraction with diethyl ether. The optimized conditions for reversed-phase HPLC with UV and fluorescence detection were as follows: 250 mm x 4.60 mm Gemini C18 column with 5 mu m particles, 28 degrees C column temperature, 95:5 (v v I) methanol:water mobile phase, 1.0 mL min(-1) flow rate and 2.6% method precision for a-tocopherol. To determine the alpha-, beta-, gamma- and delta-tocopherol content of fresh pulp,
the analyzed assai pulp was collected from three GW4869 cost different regions of production in the Amazonian estuary. This study revealed that assai pulp is rich in vitamin E (394.31 mu g g(-1) dry matter of alpha-tocopherol), confirming the nutritional properties of assai. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Background. Nephropathy associated with contrast medium exposure is a well-known complication Pitavastatin cost of IVP. However, it is uncertain whether iso-osmolar non-iodinated contrast medium (iodixanol) is less nephrotoxic than low-osmolar contrast medium (iohexol). Materials and Methods. In this single-center, double-blind, prospective study, 50 patients undergoing IVP were randomized into two groups receiving different contrast medium: iodixanol and iohexol. Patients in high risk for contrast nephropathy were included, 28 with renal insufficiency and 19 with diabetes mellitus. We compared the nephrotoxic
effect (contrast nephropathy), HM781-36B complement and cytokines profile between the iodixanol and iohexol groups. The mean volume of contrast medium in each IVP procedure was 0.8 mL/kg. Results. The incidence of contrast nephropathy was 4 percent among all patients (one iodixanol and one iohexol). We found no significant differences in contrast nephropathy and allergic reactions between the two groups. There was no significant difference in cytokine profiles in both groups (p 0.05).The incidence of allergic reaction was 16 percent among all patients. Twelve percent (3/25) had late reaction after iohexol exposure compared to four percent (2/25) with iodixanol (p = 1.0). One patient had severe skin rash due to late adverse reaction after iodixanol. No mortality was found. Conclusions. New iodixanol and iohexol contrast medium for routine IVP examination are safe and have low nephrotoxicity profile, especially in elderly or high-risk patients. Iodixanol contrast medium has an increased risk to induce severe late adverse reaction compared to iohexol. Allergic reaction may be the main adverse effect after contrast medium infusion.