“
“Background: Right to left

shunt and regional hypoventilation (reduced ventilation/perfusion ratio (V-A/Q)) have different effects on the curve relating inspired oxygen P1O2) to oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO(2)) and can JAK inhibitor be derived non-invasively from measurements Of SpO(2) and inspired oxygen pressure (P1O2) using complex models of gas exchange. We developed a simpler computerised “slide-rule” method of making these derivations.\n\nAims: To describe the slide-rule method and determine agreement between measurements derived with this and a more complex algorithm.\n\nMethods: Series Of P1O2 versus SpO(2) data points obtained during 43 studies in 16 preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia were analysed. Percentage shunt and the degree of right shift (kPa) of the P1O2 versus SpO(2) curve compared SB202190 nmr with the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve (a measure of V-A/Q were determined for

each dataset with both methods, and the results were compared using the method of Bland and Altman.\n\nResults: The computer slide-rule method produced results for all 43 datasets. The more complex model could derive results for 40/43 datasets. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) between the two methods for measurements of shunt were -1.7% (-6.5 to +3.5%) and for measurements of right shift were 0,3 kPa (-2.9 to +3.6 kPa).\n\nConclusion: The slide-rule method was reliable for deriving shunt and right shift (reduced V-A/Q) of the P1O2 versus SpO(2) curve when compared with the more complex algorithm. see more The new method should enable wider clinical application of these measurements of oxygen exchange.”
“The expansion of intensive livestock farming, especially the construction of mega stables, is highly contested in the Netherlands. In this context, local authorities try

to make decisions about situating mega stables on their territory by balancing out various interests. However, many become entangled in escalating processes and lose the trust of both citizens and farmers. On the basis of an evaluation of a decision-making process about a mega stable project in a small Dutch town, this article analyzes why distrust occurs and what local authorities could do to prevent this. In-depth interviews and participant observations show how different configurations of stakeholders became fixed in their own convictions, values, and fears, resulting in mutual annoyances, misunderstandings, blaming, and, finally, distrust. The more information public officials provided to dispel doubts about the mega stables, the more citizens started to distrust the local government. Trust is not enhanced by more information and transparency alone. The paper concludes that, once a decision-making process escalates and distrust arises, it is very difficult to revitalize the process and regain trust.