To test for significant difference in mean values of genetic dive

To test for significant difference in mean values of genetic diversities, a t-test with Welch modification for unequal variances between groups was calculated in R ( R Development Core Team, this website 2008). Though microsatellites are traditionally considered to be neutral markers, they were lately described to play a role in generating genetic variation underlying adaptive evolution (Kashi and King, 2006 and Gemayel et al., 2010), possibly also in beech (Bilela et al., 2012). Therefore, we performed an outlier test using the Lositan outlier detection platform (Antao et al., 2008) to check for potential non-neutrality of the investigated loci. Analysis of 10 families by Lefevre

et al. (2012) revealed no null alleles at any of the 16 microsatellite loci used in our study; yet null alleles at

a given locus may be present only in certain populations (Heuertz et al., 2004 and Westergren, 2010). Additionally, Oddou-Muratorio et al. (2008) found null alleles to be present at the only locus shared with our study, Fs4 (FS1_15). Therefore we tested the presence of null alleles in our dataset with Micro-Checker 2.2.0.3 (Van Oosterhout et al., 2004). Data visualization was aided by AT13387 Daniel’s XL Toolbox Add-in for Excel, version 6.52, by Daniel Kraus, Würzburg, Germany. Significant deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were detected at locus Fs4 in the adult population of the managed forest (p = 0.001). At this locus null alleles were observed in the managed stand in both cohorts. Null alleles were also observed at loci Fs3 (old growth saplings), Fs10 and Fs15 (old growth adults). For locus Fs4, the null hypothesis of independent genotypes between two loci had to be rejected (in conjunction with loci Fs5, Fs8 and Fs12, p = 0.000 in Tacrolimus (FK506) all three comparisons). Therefore, locus Fs4 was omitted from further analysis. The outlier test did not identify any outliers in the managed or old growth forests [managed

forest: 0.171 (locus Fs11) ⩽ p ⩾ 0.913 (locus Fs5)], old growth forest: [0.258 (locus Fs12) ⩽ p ⩾ 0.971 (locus Fs6)]. The mean number of alleles, effective alleles, private alleles and expected heterozygosity across loci did not significantly differ between adult trees and their regeneration either in the managed or old growth stands (Fig. 1). In addition, the means of genetic diversity estimates between the managed and old growth stands did not significantly differ for either of the cohorts (p values not reported but see vertical comparisons in Fig. 1). The mean number of rare alleles (frequency ⩽ 0.05) was lower in the managed stand (2.867) than in the old growth stand (4.133), but the means did not significantly differ from each other (t = −1.589, df = 27, p = 0.124). The mean number of rare alleles was also lower in saplings than in the adults for the managed (2.067 vs. 2.533; t = 0.674, df = 26, p = 0.506) and old growth stands (2.800 vs. 2.867; t = 0.095, df = 27, p = 0.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>