9 versus 38.4 years, p = .002). The majority (74%) of the patients were males with significantly more males among the MDQ positives (83%) compared to the MDQ negatives (70%) (p = .005). There were no significant differences regarding education level, employment status and EuropASI severity scores regarding medical condition, alcohol, family and social relations and mental problems. However, there was a significant difference on the EuropASI severity rating drugs (p = .000) between the MDQ positive

and negative patients ( Table 1). Patients with check details an assessment at T1 (N = 170, 45%) did not differ significantly from patients without an assessment (N = 205, 55%) in terms of age, gender, and employment status. However, MDQ positives at T0 with an assessment at T1 (N = 111) were less educated than

those without an assessment (N = 50). Moreover, MDQ negatives at T0 with an assessment at T1 had a higher mean section A score (0–13) than MDQ negatives without an assessment (8.87; SD ± 2.63 Selleck Panobinostat versus 5.42; SD ± 3.25, p < .01). The severity of alcohol or drug use (ASI score) did not differ between these groups (data not shown). Of the 170 patients with a SCID at T1, 35 patients (20.6%) met criteria for a lifetime diagnosis of BD (BD-I N = 8, BD-II N = 25 and BD-NOS, N = 2), 72 patients (42.4%) had a lifetime major depressive disorder, 10 patients (5.9%) a lifetime depressive disorder NOS, 10 patients (5.9%) met criteria for a substance-induced mood disorder with depressed features, 1 patient (0.6%) had a substance-induced mood disorder with manic features, and 1 patient (0.6%) a mood disorder due to a somatic condition. Forty-one patients (24.1%) did not meet criteria for any mood disorder. Fifty-eight (34.1%) patients had one lifetime SUD diagnosis, 108 patients (63.5%)

had two or more SUD diagnoses, and 4 patients (2.4%) had no lifetime SUD at all. Fifty-nine patients (34.7%) had a current diagnosis of AUD, 31 patients (18.2%) of cocaine or stimulant dependence, 26 patients (15.2%) of cannabis dependence, 8 patients (4.7%) of opiate dependence, and 5 patients (2.9%) of benzodiazepine dependence. Forty-one (24.1%) patients were problems users of alcohol and/or drugs but did not meet criteria of any current SUD. Table 2 shows that 23 of the 35 patients (65.7%) with BD had a positive MDQ score and 47 of the 135 patients through (34.8%) without BD had a negative MDQ score resulting in a weighted sensitivity of .43 and a weighted specificity of .57, a weighted LR+ of 1.00, a weighted LR− of 1.00, a PPV of .21, and a NPV of .80 (Table 3). As expected based on the LR+ and the LR−, the area under the curve (AUC) was .50 (95% CI .41–.61). Omission of the impairment criterion (section C), increases the number of patients with a positive MDQ score (N = 111) and BD from 23 to 32 and decreases the number of patients with a negative MDQ score (N = 59) and BD from 12 to 3, resulting in increased sensitivity of .85 at the expense of a decreased specificity of .