6% of body weight or a maximum of 4 exercise bouts (total of 100 minutes of exercise) were achieved. Immediately following the last exercise protocol, and still in the 37°C chamber, participants were assessed for TS, VO2, Tsk, POMS and Tre. Following these assessments, participants received a fluid replacement drink consisting of GLU or NON-GLU. They were permitted to drink https://www.selleckchem.com/products/INCB18424.html ad-libitum CHIR98014 price for 30-minutes
to allow for adequate re-hydration. The quantity consumed by each participant was recorded. Tre, Tsk, VO2, POMS, and thermal sensation data were recorded for 30 minutes after the rehydration period. Statistical analyses Using SPSS 17.0, two-way repeated measures analyses of variance (condition and time) were performed for Tre, Tsk, VO2, POMS, TS, and HTS. The level of significance was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05 and to examine the main effects of time; the dehydrated
state (immediately post last exercise bout) and most rehydrated (immediately post rehydration bout) and condition (GLU vs. NON-GLU). If a significant interaction was found, post-hoc paired sample t-tests were utilized. The POMS was administrated four total times per trial. However, the main goal of this study was on the post-rehydration recovery mood state. Results The amount of fluid consumed selleck chemicals llc during the rehydration periods was not statistically different from one another (p = 0.997) with an average of 987.5 ± 197.3 ml consumed via the GLU replacement drink and 990.0 ± 224.1 ml consumed via the NON-GLU replacement drink. Therefore, any difference in physiological PLEKHB2 measures detected
between conditions is not a result of differing amounts of re-hydration drinks consumed. Baseline measures of the Baseline measures of Tre, Tsk, VO2, POMS, TS, and HTS and were assessed within 10 minutes upon entering an environmentally controlled chamber set 37°C. Baseline physiological measurements were similar between conditions. In particular, Tre (37.3 ± 0.3 vs. 37.0 ± 0.5°C) and Tsk (34.7 ± 1.4 vs. 35.1 ± 0.5°C), Glucose level (115.3 ± 19.6 vs. 127.1 ± 23.1 ml/dl), and VO2 (4.9 ± 1.3 vs. 5.5 ± 2.7 ml/kg/min) were not different between GLU and NON-GLU, respectively. In addition, baseline POMS TMD (−2.8 ± 11.1 vs. -4.3 ± 8.5), TS (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7), and HTS (1.4 ± 1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 0.5) were not different between two conditions, respectively. After dehydration (2.6% of body weight loss) Tre and Tsk were elevated in both conditions (Table 1). However, there were no significant differences in Tre and Tsk between conditions. Despite the elevated body temperature, metabolic rate did not increase compared to baseline and no difference was found between two conditions. The blood glucose was decreased compared to baseline but there was no significant difference observed between groups. These data showed that upon completion of the exercise bout both conditions were equally dehydrated and in similar physiologic states.