Factors influencing this process include those that induce active secretion, those

that inhibit active absorption, osmotic agents, and factors that stimulate intestinal motility. The most common causes of acute diarrhea include infections and drugs. Chronic diarrhea is often a diagnostic challenge and has a broad etiology. The diagnosis can often be made by a thorough history and examination with the addition of basic blood tests and stool analysis; however, exhaustive investigations are infrequently required. This chapter describes the pathophysiology in relation to the causes and symptom complexes of diarrhea, with simple diagnostic algorithms. “
“Most studies have shown that lamivudine (LAM) prophylaxis is sufficient to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in recipients of hepatitis B core antibody positive (HBcAb+) allografts. However, de novo hepatitis B (DNHB) is known to occur in this

patient population. Herein, Panobinostat research buy MAPK Inhibitor Library screening we report a case series of four liver transplant recipients who developed DNHB after receiving HBcAb+ allografts due to acquisition of LAM resistance mutations, suggesting that LAM prophylaxis may be suboptimal. A retrospective chart review was performed of all adult liver transplants performed at Mount Sinai from 2001 to 2010. A total of 79 patients received HBcAb+ allografts for non-hepatitis B-related liver disease. Of these 79 recipients, four patients developed DNHB and were found to have documented LAM resistance. With the increasing use of HBcAb+ donor livers, we suspect that there

will also be a growing number of cases of DNHB due to acquisition of LAM resistance. We suggest that other agents, such as entecavir or tenofovir, be considered for use as prophylaxis in this patient population to decrease this risk. “
“Background and Aim:  There has been little information about the long-term outcome and prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and extrahepatic metastases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical factors affecting survival after extrahepatic metastasis and to determine the acetylcholine survival benefit of controlling intrahepatic HCC. Methods:  Between 2004 and 2009, a total of 240 consecutive patients with HCC and extrahepatic metastasis were recruited. Based on tumor extent, performance, and hepatic function, the patients underwent locoregional and/or systemic treatments. The treatment response of the intrahepatic tumor after extrahepatic metastasis and other prognostic parameters were analyzed retrospectively. Results:  During the mean follow up of 276 days, 222 patients died; the median survival time was 146 days. Multivariate analysis revealed that Child–Pugh class A, smaller hepatic tumor size, absence of portal venous invasion, single metastatic organ involvement, and objective treatment response of the intrahepatic tumor were the favorable prognostic factors for survival.