Results of in

vitro-fertilized embryo survival following cryopreservation have been inconsistent among studies Everolimus in vitro [26], [34] and [10] and vitrification procedures for in vitro-produced bovine embryos still need improvement in order to reduce injuries to the embryos [21] and [11]. In the current study we observed that vitrification can also alter gene expression in bovine embryos produced in vitro. The lowest relative amount of Aqp3 transcripts in the vitrified-warmed embryos reported in the current study might be due to the low capacity of embryo genome in reestablishing Aqp3 transcripts store after vitrification procedures. Such disturb may suggest that despite the re-expansion and in vitro survival at 72 h after warming, vitrified-warmed embryos may undergo molecular alterations that compromise the further development. For instance, expression of Aqp3 gene and protein seems to be important to preserve homeostasis during pregnancy [2] and its deregulation may be associated to oligohydramnio in humans [41]. Therefore, alterations on expression of genes important for conception and gestation maintenance, like Aqp3, could contribute to inconsistent survival and pregnancy rates of vitrified-warmed

bovine embryos produced by in vitro fertilization. In conclusion, embryo ability to undergo shrinkage and swelling is influenced by medium used in a co-culture system and by embryo stage; therefore such aspects may be involved in cryopreservation efficiency SPTLC1 and should be taking into account. Vitrification can Bioactive Compound Library high throughput alter gene expression of in vitro-fertilized bovine embryos co-cultured with cumulus cells but the expression of Aqp3 and Na/K ATPase1 genes seems to be not associated to rehydration of bovine embryos challenged

with NaCl hypertonic solution. The authors thank to M.P. Palhao for his assistance on figures and graphs edition and B.C. Carvalho and M.M. Pereira for assistance on embryo cryopreservation. MC Boite was supported by CAPES foundation. This study was supported by CNPq project No. 471517, Fapemig project No. CAG1217-05 and Embrapa MP1 01.07.01.002.05. “
“Just over 60 years have passed since the first successful experiment on freezing goat sperm [34]. In spite of all this time, protocols for goat semen cryopreservation continue to be developed due to the wide range of results found for sperm motility, considered the parameter of choice to determine the degree of sperm damage inflicted by the cryopreservation procedure [3], [9], [18] and [19]. These results have varied from low values as 6% up to 62%, being the last reached with the use of antioxidants into the diluents [6], [7] and [27]. The improvement of buck semen cryopreservation technologies requires in-depth knowledge of the properties of current extenders [29].