Some researchers assume that inter-fluvial forests were not occupied extensively and thus not altered by people (Bush and Silman, 2007, Denevan, 1996, McMichael et al., 2012 and Steege et al., 2013). But many of the documented cultural forests are indeed in interfluves away from the mainstream (Balee, 1989, Balee, 2013, Balick, 1984, Goulding and Smith, 2007, Levis et al., 2012, Politis, 2007 and Smith Epigenetics inhibitor et al., 2007). My surveys along the Curua River in the middle Xingu interfluves also encountered anthropic forests at current

and former villages and at archeological sites (Fig. 13) (Roosevelt et al., 2009:465–466). Many researchers depict oligarchic forests as “uninhabited” (Pitman et al., 2001 and Steege et al.,

2013) and assume they are a natural phenomenon, without conducting research to exclude a human influence, however. Amazonian forests in different regions differ significantly from one another in topography, climate, geology, hydrology, structure, seasonality, and history, but, nonetheless, they often resemble each other in having this pattern of unexpected dominance and density of a small group of plant species. This pattern has been found wherever Amazon Compound C forests have been inventoried and has yet to be explained by natural factors. The diverse regional and local forests of Amazonia are in essence united by these dominants, most of which have an association with humans. The so-called oligarchs (from Greek for “rule by few”) in the Amazon forests are a group of more than 200 predominant species that make up only 1.4% of all the Amazon forest species but almost half of the trees in any given forest

(Steege et al., 2013). Traditionally, Amazonian tropical forests are considered to be taxonomically very diverse floras in which individuals of most species are locally rare and widely separated from one another, limiting the intensity of exploitation possible in any one place (Longman and Jenik, 1987:115–123; Junk et al., 2010, Pires, 1984, Whitmore and Prance, 1987 and Whitmore, 2010:149–152). Therefore, where a small group of species are significantly more common than the others, in contrast to this pattern, and no natural reason has been suggested, these groupings may not be Forskolin in vitro a solely natural product but a partly human one. Researchers recognize that trees and shrubs are much affected by numerous faunal species, so it’s hardly a reach to consider human effects. The dominant tree species tend to be ones valued and actively managed by Amazonian people today, or ones that benefit from the effects of human occupation. People influence them variously: planting them, concentrating or dispersing their propagules, clearing around them, protecting them, attracting or eliminating their animal predators, and/or fertilizing them with their refuse.